What mechanism is in place to prevent one branch of government from becoming too powerful?

The mechanism that prevents one branch of government from becoming too powerful is known as checks and balances. This system is an integral part of the U.S. Constitution and was designed to ensure that the three branches of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—monitor and limit each other's powers. Each branch has specific authority and responsibilities, and mechanisms are in place that allow them to check each other's actions.

For instance, the legislative branch has the power to make laws, but the executive branch can veto those laws. Conversely, the judicial branch can review laws passed by Congress and declare them unconstitutional, thereby invalidating them. This interplay ensures that no single branch can dominate the others, maintaining a balance of power that is essential for a functioning democratic government.

While executive orders are directives issued by the president, they do not provide a mechanism for limiting power between branches; they are, in fact, an expression of presidential power. Judicial review allows the courts to interpret the law and assess the constitutionality of legislative acts but is one aspect of the checks and balances system rather than a standalone mechanism. Majority rule refers to a principle in decision-making, primarily within the legislative process, and does not address the need for power balance among government branches.